Home  
  Ulagam  
    ? Rajan Darbar
    ? Religion
    ? Sitharal
    ? Viewpoint
  Kondattam  
  Arangam  
  Nandhavanam        
  Vanavil  
  Anjaraipetti
 
 

Double Standards Tantamount to Inciting Terrorism


 

International coalition, which claims to wage a war against cross-border terrorism, owes an explanation to India for their silence. The Resolution 1373 passed by the U.N. Security Council in September 2001 makes it mandatory for all the U.N. members to thwart every form of terrorism regardless of the motivations at work. The resolution was adopted under the U.N. Charter's Chapter 7, which explicitly provides for enforcement measures such as economic sanctions or military force if a member-state does not act against those who harbour and finance terrorism. The nation is with George Fernandes in lamenting that India's plea for steps to combat cross-border terrorism remains unanswered. If USA can wage a war against Afghanistan for what it suffered on 11th September 2001, it can not have different preaching to India when Pakistan meddles with our internal security and sovereignty.

USA should ask Pakistan to restrain from escalating tension at the Indo-Pak border. The minimum it should do is to ask Pakistan as to what is the provocation for its enmity against India at this point in time? If Pakistan wants to refute India's charges, let it put its point across to the world. India should also share the evidences that it had collected to suggest that the terrorists involved in the December 13 strike were trained and funded by Pakistan. The fact that the terrorists are Paskitanis does not suggest that they were trained and funded by Pakistan. The involvement of ISI should be established clearly to the world. Evidences can be shared with Pakistan if it is genuinely committed to act against terrorism. But its credentials struck low ebb when it made a preposterous statement that that Indian intelligence agencies were behind the December 13 attack on Parliament. This negated the possibility of conceding Pakistan's demand for a joint probe.

When India is trying to defend itself from terrorist threats, why is that Pakistan massed troops on the border? Is this not clear evidence that Pakistan knew about the current situation in advance and prepared for this occasion. India does not want a war, it only wants to end terrorism. This should be encouraged by U.N., USA, Britain and other world countries. What USA and Britain had done till today (in terms of pressurizing Pakistan) is nothing but symbolic. More meaningful action is expected from these countries, who claim to wipe out terrorism from the world. USA does not need to be told that it is not difficult to deal with terrorism, the difficulties only arose when a state adopts it as a policy.

It is very clear that with the fall of Taliban regime in Afghanistan who provided a protective cover for Pakistan to train militants and wage a proxy war against India, Pakistan has no other way than to counter India blatantly. Now, Pakistan needs a political cover for training and staging facilities to carry out cross-border terrorism. Unfortunately now it is pushed to the corner to take action against its own creations (LeT, JeM). These developments made Pakistan to go desperate and foist a war on India. USA does not require great intelligence to understand this. Still it is keeping a strategic silence. It is time for USA to act decisively without dilly-dallying in the name of political diplomacy. If it continues its soft approach towards Pakistan, history would throw mud on USA for its double standards.

If the USA and the world permit Gen. Musharraf to claim that what is going on in Kashmir is an indigenous liberation movement and thus outside the purview of the American injunction against terrorism, India would not take it. It knows how to tackle terrorism against its people on its own. If Pakistan is allowed to maintain the infrastructure of madrassas, terrorist organisations and logistical resources which have long been in place, it would offer alternative employment to the hordes of defeated terrorists now flooding Pakistan.

As one columnists wrote in "The Hindu", USA has to abandon the permissiveness towards Gen. Musharraf's double standard on terrorism. What the U.S. has done in the name of realpolitik all these years must be undone in the name of trying to avert war. If U.S. had achieved a higher measure of influence over the Pakistan Government than it has enjoyed in many years, as it claims, it is time to demonstrate that capability by compelling the Musharraf junta to decisively dissolve the terrorist infrastructure it sponsors and move toward serious, non-violent negotiations with India over Kashmir and other outstanding grievances. The U.N. and USA need to make the Pakistani leadership understand that terrorism, as an instrument of political blackmail is no longer acceptable. Also, the Pakistani Head must be made to understand that the lure of American military and diplomatic favour can no longer exist as an excuse for Pakistan refusing to engage in a sincere bilateral dialogue with India. If this message does not go into the head of the Pakistani Head, we have nobody other than Bush to blame for his inspirations to abet terrorism. In that case, what is the punishment for Bush as he would be seen to sponsor a State to sponsor terrorism?

Naangal Vimarsanam   © 2001 www.nilacharal.com. All rights reserved.