Home  
  Ulagam  
    ? Rajan Darbar
    ? Religion
    ? Sitharal
    ? Viewpoint
  Kondattam  
  Arangam  
  Nandhavanam        
  Vanavil  
  Anjaraipetti  
 

Peace and Prosperity and NOT War and destruction-Eliminate Terrorism but not by Waging a War

page 1 2


The author acknowledges the information fed to him by Prakash Louis (For - People for Peace), Indian Social Institute, Lodi Road, New Delhi and Pervin Jehangir & Ram Puniyani (EKTA, Mumbai). The author also acknowledges the useful discussions he had with N Narayanan, an analyst and for his inputs.

The attack by terrorists on the Parliament on December 13, 2001 has come as a severe jolt to us. We have been witnessing the destructive acts of militants, many of whom are inspired by Pakistan, in Kashmir from last two decades. How can this terrorism be controlled and eradicated? There is a talk to cross the border and destroy the terrorist camps. Also there is a talk to wage a war against Pakistan a la America against Afghanistan or Israel against Palestine. Is war the correct option for us?

We are aware that US actions cannot be emulated by a country like us. To begin with Pakistan is a Nuclear State backed by USA. It has been doing mischief and has acted as the trainer of the terrorist with tacit support from US. Israel again has been able to get away with its aggressions due to the unconditional backing from US. Tactically to wage a war against a Nuclear weapon state is not the same as waging a war against the destitute Nation like Afghanistan or against helpless Palestinians. Waging a war in this region will definitely invite US intervention. Already through its war against Iraq and now against Afghanistan US has a heavy military presence in the region. India's war against Pakistan will further strengthen the US influence here. Apart from the heavy loss of life and property we will be inviting direct US intervention in our country, which will be detrimental to our interests in the short and long run both. A war in the region can as well lead to Nuclear Holocaust, which will put us back by decades.

So what is the solution to the problem of terrorism? We can operate at three levels. One, strengthen our Intelligence and security network. Second we need to win over the hearts and minds of people of Kashmir by strengthening the democratic process there. At the same time we have to launch a diplomatic offensive against Pakistan. World has seen its role and surely our diplomacy will be able to win over the world opinion for us. And lastly we should put all the pressure on Pakistan, directly and through US to come to negotiating table and to stop sponsoring terrorism.

All right thinking people both in India and Pakistan are alarmed and immensely saddened at the disturbing developments following the deplorable December 13 terrorist attack on Parliament House, which has triggered a dangerous round of India-Pakistan hostility. The two governments have become increasingly belligerent. There is a fearsome military build-up on the border, reportedly including deployment of nuclear-capable missiles. This bears no logical relationship to the stated objective of countering terrorism, or of bringing the culprits of December 13 to book.

It is imperative to immediately cool the fevered hostility and defuse the eyeball-to-eyeball confrontation. India must forthwith reverse the harsh diplomatic measures imposed on Pakistan. Pakistan must reciprocate. Breaking communication links, and severely downgrading diplomatic missions, can only impose hardship upon peace-loving citizens and further vitiate today's climate, without encouraging a cooperative response from either government. India should step up diplomatic pressure by making the world countries and specifically UN to influence Pakistan but we should not close the doors for discussion or any other diplomatic channels.

At the time of writing this article, there are rumours quoting American Spy agencies that both the governments have handed over the nuclear arsenal to their armies. If this was true, the South Asia is heading for a big disaster. The fears are gaining ground as both the heads of governments, Prime Minister Vajpayee and President Musharraf refuse to talk to each other in Katmandu on the way-side during the SAARC summit. The SAARC summit loses its purpose if it can not influence two of the major countries in the Association to talk to each other and come to an understanding. In this same column, few weeks back, I wrote that "a decisive battle is unavoidable". That was an expression of exasperation, as Pakistan did not seem to hear what India says and there was no semblance of pressure on Pakistan from world countries. The majority of the Pakistanis seem to be keen on stable and peaceful relation with India as the majority of Indians do. We all thought that there will be internal riots in Pakistan if their government supports USA against Taliban, but exactly the opposite had happened. They seem to be more relaxed after the end of Talibans. This clearly is an indication that Jehadis do not command any popular support within Pakistan as it is painted in the media. With Musharraf at the helm of affairs in Pakistan, it is the right time for India to use its diplomacy to the maximum possible extent to get things done from across the border through any other country or USA. .....more

Naangal vimarsanam   © 2001 www.nilacharal.com. All rights reserved.